OpenVM MOOC: un diseño para el aprendizaje autorregulado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2021.75.1971Palabras clave:
virtual mobility, open virtual mobility, MOOC, self-regulated learning, learning designResumen
This paper presents the design of two miniMOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) Autonomy-driven learning and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), developed in the Open Virtual Mobility MOOC. The design is based on two concepts: microlearning and SRL. All the MOOC elements were designed to support SRL. From a descriptive and quantitative approach, the research aims to explore participants' satisfaction and their perception on the supporting roles of the miniMOOC for SRL. Data was collected through an online survey through which 375 answers were collected. Results show the general satisfaction of learners with the MOOC design. As for the SRL design gamification and visualization of pathways were more relevant for certain SRL phases such as monitoring learning. OER and related quizzes were useful for all SRL phases. Quizzes especially supported self-reflection. Open Badges supported the forethought phase of SRL. Social elements such as forums and eportfolios obtained the lowest rates in relation to support of SRL. The paper concludes with recommendations for educational research and MOOCs design.
Financiación
Erasmus and DAAD
Descargas
Citas
Alonso-Mencía, M.E., Alario-Hoyos, C., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Delgado Kloos. C. (2020) Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: lessons learned from a literature review, Educational Review, 72(3), 319-345, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566208
Buchem, I., & Carlino, C. (2019). Implementation and User-Testing of Gamification for Learning in the Open Virtual Mobility Learning Hub. Open Virtual Mobility Erasmus+ (2017-2020). https://www.openvirtualmobility.eu/topics/outputs
Buchem, I., Poce, A., & Tur, G. (2019). Microaprendizaje en práctica. In Salinas, J.; and Marín, V., I. (ed.) Monográfico microlearning. Comunicación y Pedagogía, (46-52).
Buchem, I., Tur, G., & Urbina, S. (2018). Quality assurance for attainment, assessment and recognition of virtual mobility skills in context of open education. QA Framework in the Open Virtual Mobility project. Edulearn Conference 2-4 July 2018. https://iated.org/concrete3/view_abstract.php?paper_id=65036
Challen, G., & Seltzer, M. (2014) Enabling MOOC collaborations through modularity. Proceedings of the 2014 Learning with MOOCs Practitioner's Workshop. http://blue.cse.buffalo.edu/papers/lwmoocs2014-mmoocs/
Colman, D. (2013). MOOC Interrupted: Top 10 Reasons Our Readers Didn't Finish a Massive Open Online Course. http://www.openculture.com/2013/04/10_reasons_you_didnt_complete_a_mooc.html
Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R. H., Chang, V., & Morales, M. (2014). Attrition in MOOC: Lessons Learned from Drop-Out Students. Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. MOOC and Big Data, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4
Haug, S., Wodzicki, K., Cress, U., & Moskaliuk, J. (2014). Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: Do open badges and certificates of attendance motivate learners to invest more. In U. Cress and C. Delgado (Eds.), EMOOCs, 66-72. shorturl.at/htGP5
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
Khalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs Completion Rates and Possible Methods to Improve Retention - A Literature Review. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014, World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 1305-1313. Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147656/
Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven: Belgium, http://www.stanford.edu/~cpiech/bio/papers/deconstructingDisengagement.pdf
Lackner, E., Ebner, M., & Khalil, M. (2015). MOOCs as granular systems: design patterns to foster participant activity. eLearning Papers 42, 1-10. https://graz.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/moocs-as-granular-systems-design-patterns-to-foster-participant-a
Lee, D., Lee, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2019). Systematic literature review on self-regulated learning in massive open online courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,35(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3749
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs, The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.
Nicholson, S. (2012). Strategies for meaningful gamification: Concepts behind transformative play and participatory museums. Presented at Meaningful Play 2012. Lansing. http://scottnicholson.com/pubs/meaningfulstrategies.pdf
Poce, A. (2020). A Massive Open Online Course Designed to Support the Development of Virtual Mobility Transversal Skills: Preliminary Evaluation Results from European Participants. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), (21), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-poce
Poulová, P., Černá, M., & Svobodová, L. (2009). University network? Efficiency of virtual mobility. In Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Educational Technologies (EDUTE09) (pp. 87-92). ISSN 1790-5109.
Pérez-Álvarez, R. Pérez-Sanagustín and M. J. J. Maldonado (2016) "How to design tools for supporting self-regulated learning in MOOCs? Lessons learned from a literature review from 2008 to 2016," 2016 XLII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI), Valparaiso, 2016, pp. 1-12, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2016.7833361.
Pilli, O., & Admiraal, W. (2016). A Taxonomy of Massive Open Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(3), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6174
Sun, G., Cui, T., Guo, W., Beydoun, G., Xu, D., & Shen, J. (2015). Micro Learning Adaptation in MOOC: A Software as a Service and a Personalized Learner Model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9412, 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_16
Teresevičienė, M., Volungevičienė, A., & Daukšienė, E. (Eds.). (2011). Virtual mobillity for teachers and students in higher education. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University
Tur, G., Urbina, S., Firssova, O., Rajagopal, K., & Buchem, I. (2018). Open Virtual Mobility: a learning design 4 SRL. Proceedings of the EDEN Research Workshop 2018, Barcelona: Spain. https://research.ou.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/7833338/pre_print_EDEN_2018_SRL_manuscript_final.pdf
Tur, G., Buchem, I., & Urbina, S. (2019). The self-regulated learning quality assurance approach to designing MOOCs. Insights from the Open Virtual Mobility project. Proceedings of the Edulearn Conference 2019, Palma: Spain. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1403
Vázquez-Cano, D. E., López Meneses, D. E., Fernández Márquez, E., & Ballesteros Regaña, D. C. (2018). Los nuevos entornos virtuales de aprendizaje permanente (MOOC) y sus posibilidades educativas en ámbitos sociales y educativos. Píxel-Bit. Revista De Medios Y Educación, (53), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2018.i53.12
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Con la entrega del trabajo, los autores ceden los derechos de publicación a la revista Edutec. Por su parte, Edutec autoriza su distribución siempre que no se altere su contenido y se indique su origen. Al final de cada artículo publicado en Edutec se indica cómo se debe citar.
La dirección y el consejo de redacción de Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, no aceptan ninguna responsabilidad sobre las afirmaciones e ideas expresadas por los autores en sus trabajos.
